UK time is: 17:41:19
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Coates in spat over refs

It seems as though Peter Coates's private criticism of referees has now become public news.

The Stoke chairman, one of the few club bosses not to seek the limelight, has become embroiled in a row with David Ellery, the former referee.

Both sit on the FA Council and it was during one of their recent meetings about the FA's 'Respect' campaign that Peter Coates expressed his dismay with the unfair treatment that often seems apparent when the smaller Premier League clubs play one of the so-called 'top four' clubs.

According to the Daily Mail, who broke the story, it seems the recent Chelsea match at the Brit, when the referee allowed play to go into the 96th minute when Chelsea managed a late goal, was the tipping point for Coates. He apparently went on to say, tongue in cheek, that he felt the referee wouldn't blow the final whistle until Chelsea had scored - certainly his views echo many a Stoke fan's suspicions.

It was also reported that he went on to question why the players from those teams often felt compelled to surround the referee at the merest opportunity, something that was greatly in evidence in the match against Manchester United at the Brit just a week ago, when Rooney seemed to question every possible decision (or lack of one) with Howard Webb.

Ellery seems to have taken these comments as a personal insult and demanded that Coates retract them, but since this was a private council meeting and he was only expressing his views, Peter seems to have rightly refused.

We all know that refereeing is a thankless task and some decisions are always going to be open to question, but until the football hierarchy get to grips with those things that can be easily sorted - such as fixed time periods (as in Rugby League) and the use of goal line technology that would end the 'did it or didn't it' madness that has marred several League matches in recent years - fans will continue to be aggrieved if they think that there is one rule for their club and another for the opposition.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Chris Baldwin Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday October 3 2009

Time: 9:41PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
What's the betting Coates gets a disrepute charge and Fergie doesn't for his pathetic little rant of yesterday? (here's the story in case you missed it - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1218016/Ref-didnt-add-time-wasnt-fit-rants-Sir-Alex.html) One rule for the sky 4, one for everyone else. RESPECT! (Not)
fifthcolumnblue
Report Abuse
04/10/2009 17:59:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Stoke City Articles

Archived Stoke City Articles

List All Vital Stoke Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. lloyd_17 11

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
7. Spurs 30 16 5 9 5 53
8. Swansea 30 12 7 11 -4 43
9. West Ham 30 11 9 10 3 42
10. Stoke 30 12 6 12 -3 42
11. Crystal Palace 30 9 9 12 -5 36
12. Newcastle 30 9 8 13 -15 35
13. Everton 30 8 10 12 -4 34

Breaking League News

Lambert Left Villa Healthy
Aston Villa : 28/03/2015 15:28:00
Chelsea Player Focus: Live Brazil v Chile Training
Chelsea : 28/03/2015 14:15:01
Live Coverage Of Brazil v Chile At The Emirates
Arsenal : 28/03/2015 14:15:00
Chelsea To Leave Stamford Bridge?
Chelsea : 28/03/2015 13:20:01
THE MAN WHO CAN DO NO WRONG!
Spurs : 28/03/2015 11:45:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Goal of the Month (March)
Suggested By:  
Moses v Everton (H) 50%
Diouf v Everton (H) 0%
Diouf v C Palace (H) 50%