UK time is: 11:42:17
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

What's wrong with Pulis' rolling contract?

The national media appear to have been taken by surprise with the news that Tony Pulis is more than happy with a one year rolling contract.

Media speculation at the weekend was rife with news that Tony was going to be offered a 'new three year contract' but it has been swiftly rebuffed by the Stoke manager who told them that he was quite happy with his rolling contract.

That should come as no surprise to Stoke fans who'll remember that he insisted on a rolling contract during the Icelandic regime back in 2005 - and was then promptly sacked just weeks after signing it.

At the time, he said that he preferred the 'never ending contract' over a fixed term contract because of two previous contract disputes that he's had with the chairmen of Portsmouth and Gillingham.

At least, this time around, TP seems to have an excellent relationship with his current chairman, Peter Coates: 'I have the best chairman in the world, so I don't have to be looking over my shoulder at my contract situation all the time.'

It's no coincidence that the Potters' current run of success just may be down, in no small part, to the managerial stability in the club.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



For the very latest Premier League odds

For massive weekly jackpots - Play the Football Pools Online

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Chris Baldwin Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday May 12 2009

Time: 11:57PM

Your Comments

I agree - the rolling contract seems to take a lot of the tension out of any manager's contractual arrangements. It provides clear compensation (12 months wages) whether a manager is sacked or whether he leaves to take up another position. I suspect that if all managers had such contracts there would be less blood letting than there is each season. Obviously it isn't going to come in for players because (unlike managers) there is often a huge transfer fee involved when a player changes clubs and clubs want to tie the player to a longer contract than 12 months in these days of the Bosman transfer.
fornside
Lets face it no matter what contract you have you only as good as your last game in the cut and thrust of the Prem
denno4
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Ireland pens 3-year Stoke contract (Tuesday April 15 2014)

Fluent Stoke ease past Newcastle (Monday April 14 2014)

Stats: Chelsea v Stoke City (Monday April 7 2014)

Marvelous Mark-h (Wednesday April 2 2014)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Stoke Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. lloyd_17 2

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Stoke 1 - 0 Newcastle
Chelsea 3 - 0 Stoke
Stoke 1 - 0 Hull City
Aston Villa 1 - 4 Stoke
Stoke 3 - 1 West Ham
Norwich 1 - 1 Stoke

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
7. Man Utd 33 17 6 10 18 57
8. Southampton 34 13 9 12 5 48
9. Newcastle 34 14 4 16 -14 46
10. Stoke 34 11 10 13 -10 43
11. West Ham 34 10 7 17 -9 37
12. Crystal Palace 33 11 4 18 -15 37
13. Hull City 33 10 6 17 -6 36

Breaking League News

Could Man City lose Champions League spot?
Everton : 16/04/2014 11:00:00
PATHETIC - EARLY GOALS
Spurs : 16/04/2014 10:18:00
The Goodison factor
Everton : 16/04/2014 10:00:00
So it's OK to dive sometimes?
Arsenal : 16/04/2014 09:38:00
Team News v Everton
Crystal Palace : 16/04/2014 09:11:00
Ince In Demand
Crystal Palace : 16/04/2014 09:09:00
It`s Good to Talk
Fulham : 16/04/2014 07:43:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM vs. Newcastle
Suggested By:  
Begovic 9%
Cameron 0%
Shawcross 8%
Wilson 0%
Pieters 0%
Whelan 0%
N'Zonzi 0%
Arnautovic 75%
Ireland 0%
Odemwingie 8%
Crouch 0%
Adam 0%
Walters 0%